Author Archives: Nick Smith

Strongest Impressions of 2011

Jeffrey Overstreet has been our guide for film viewing for the last several years. We’ve always found his reviews to be insightful, and he’s certainly led us into a deeper appreciation for the poetic and artistic character of good film. A great place to start is with his yearly top ten lists. Here are his lists for 1980-2010. He recently released his lists for 2011, in two parts:

Strongest Impressions of 2011, Part 1

Strongest Impressions of 2011, Part 2

I should also mention that Overstreet is a talented novelist. His books are all worth reading.

While not as canonical for us as his film reviews, his list of top albums for 2011 was just published as well.

A Stretched People

“We are a stretched people, citizens of a kingdom that is both older and newer than anything offered by ‘the contemporary.’ The practices of Christian worship over the liturgical year form in us something of an ‘old soul’ that is perpetually pointed to a future, longing for a coming kingdom, and seeking to be such a stretched people in the present who are a foretaste of the coming kingdom” (James K. A. Smith, Desiring the Kingdom, 159).

A Sign to the Coming Kingdom

“‘God’s reign arrives wherever Jesus overcomes the power of evil.’ Thus Jesus erects signs of healing and salvation that point to the presence of the kingdom. Again we see the missionary thrust of Jesus’ ministry. His ministry inspires us to prolong the logic of his mission. Since God’s reign has already come, it will come. God’s reign is both gift and promise, celebration and anticipation. The church’s mission is to live in the tension of the already-but-not-yet so that ‘something of the “not yet” may take shape in the here and now.’ Thus the church, like Jesus, erects signs of God’s reign; it commits itself to attack evil in its manifestations and ‘to initiate, here and now, approximations and anticipations of God’s reign,’ especially in the life of the church. The church’s communal life itself will be a sign to the coming kingdom, a people in whom something of the ‘not yet’ is in evidence. As sign the church will embody new relationships that point to the love and justice of the kingdom. As such it will be a ‘radically revolutionary movement’ providing an attractive alternative.” Michael Goheen, “A Critical Examination of David Bosch’s Missional Reading of Luke,” in Reading Luke: Interpretation, Reflection, Formation, p. 238.

The Discipline of Reading

The Taste of Honey

“But book-reading is never less than a discipline, and discipline requires self-discipline, and self-discipline is never easy. If we are honest both about the delights of reading and the discomforts of reading, I think we can better help our friends discover that books offer life-altering use and life-giving delight, knowledge and pleasure, truth and joy, light and heat.”

Reading as Discipline

“This does not mean that our appetites are not in need of some, or even great, disciplining, but the goal of all discipline is not restraint but freedom. The trained appetite is free to gain the most pleasure—and use—from the best books.”

The Righteousness of God in Daniel 9

Sinclair Ferguson, commenting on Daniel 9 in his commentary on Daniel, pp. 177-178:

‘Daniel’s praying was of the same order [as that of Elijah, cited by James] as his appeal to the “righteousness” of God eloquently testifies (vv. 7, 16). The Old Testament term “righteousness” has a specifically covenantal orientation. The young Martin Luther could not see this when he struggled to understand what Paul meant by “the righteousness of God” (Rom. 1:17). Of course, Luther was not helped by the fact that his Latin Bible translated Paul’s Greek word dikaiosune (righteousness) as justitia (justice). Luther’s mistake has sometimes been repeated by evangelical Christians. Often righteousness has been thought of merely as the equivalent of the just punishment of God. Preachers therefore may often accompany the use of the phrase “the righteousness of God” with the gesticulation of a clenched fist. It is clear even from this passage, however, that this is to reduce the full biblical meaning of God’s righteousness. Daniel sees the righteousness of God both as the basis for God’s judgment of the people (v. 7) and also as the basis for his own prayer for forgiveness (v. 16). How can this be? In Scripture, “righteousness” basically means “integrity.” Sometimes it is defined as “conformity to a norm.” In the case of God, the norm to which he conforms is his own being and character. He is true to himself; he always acts in character.

‘God has expressed the norm of his relationship to his people by means of a covenant. He will always be true and faithful to his covenant and the promises enshrined in it. Plainly, God’s righteousness is his faithfulness to his covenant relationship.

‘Daniel underlines God’s faithfulness to his covenantal promise to punish the covenant-breaking of his people: “O Lord, righteousness belongs to you, but to us shame of face… Yes, all Israel has transgressed your law, and has departed [from the covenant] so as not to obey your voice; therefore the curse and the oath written in the Law of Moses… has been poured out on us because we have sinned against him… Therefore the Lord has kept the disaster in mind, and brought it upon us; for the Lord our God is righteous in all the works which he does, though we have not obeyed his voice” (vv. 7-14). In contrast, the same righteousness of God is made the ground for Daniel’s appeal for mercy because he knows that God has promised to receive his penitent people and to restore them to fellowship with himself. His covenant righteousness holds out the hope of forgiveness, and Daniel clings to this with his whole heart: “O Lord, according to all your righteousness… let your anger and your fury be turned away… because of our sins… your people are a reproach to all those around us” (v. 16).’

The White Pine

The White Pine has a new website. They also had a nice mention in this article about the Brass Razoo.

Future of Christianity

I recently finished reading Philip Jenkins’ “Future of Christianity” trilogy: The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, The New Faces of Christianity: Believing the Bible in the Global South, and God’s Continent: Christianity, Islam, and Europe’s Religious Crisis. I don’t intend to write full reviews of the three books, but I do want to recommend them, and to do so for several reasons.

First, The Next Christendom is a much-needed antidote to the pessimism of so many American Christians about the future of Christianity in the world. Jenkins paints a compelling picture of a vibrant and growing Christian faith in Africa and Asia – a faith with many weaknesses, to be sure, but one that is in many ways on the right track and growing in the right direction.

We have confessional reasons to be optimistic about the future of the church – Daniel 2 says the kingdom will grow, and Jesus made it clear that the gates of hell will not prevail against the church he is building. He ascended to heaven as one who has received all authority in heaven and on earth. The church’s victory is along the path of suffering and death – but it is victory nonetheless.  Jenkins argues that we can see this growth happening around the world. Whatever weaknesses – and even decline – we may think is present in the West, Western Christians need to fight their myopic tendencies and broaden their sense of the kingdom. We should be able to be excited about what God is doing around the world.

Second, The New Faces of Christianity does a wonderful job of portraying the diversity – in faithfulness, maturity, and traditions – within global Christianity. There are many weaknesses, many deep and troubling problems in the churches in Asia and Africa. (Though, as Jenkins is quick to point out, there are plenty of problems in the Western church as well.) At the same time, there are large and growing expressions of historic Christian orthodoxy – often as a result of many of these cultures not suffering the effects of the Enlightenment. The global church never thinks to doubt the supernatural, communal, and public aspects of the Christian faith. Jenkins paints compelling pictures of the churches in Africa, for example, giving a central place to church community, to the public reading of Scripture, and to the implications of the Christian faith for all of life.

Third, God’s Continent makes a convincing case that the decline of European Christianity and the rise of Islam in Europe is not reaching quite the apocalyptic heights feared by so many. Islam is growing, but it is in many ways capitulating to the same forces of modernism and secularism that have weakened European Christianity. At the same time, the immigration trends that are bringing Islam to Europe are also bringing to the continent the vibrant Christian faith of Africa and Asia – a faith that has not capitulated to modernism’s insistence upon a deep divide between the sacred and the secular, between the religious and the political. Jenkins argues that this growing Christian faith is often ignored – not because it isn’t real or vital, but because it is found primarily in immigrant communities. Old-stock Europeans see immigrants from Asia and Africa and simply assume that Islam is on the rise – when, in fact, many of those immigrants are bringing a Christian faith that is often quite orthodox and vibrant.

Jenkins certainly grants that the rise of Islam is a real challenge for Europe, and he devotes quite a bit of effort at describing a way forward. Too much of his proposed solution, however, involves hoping that both Islam and Christianity make their peace with Western secularism, embracing a deep divide between the sacred and the secular, the religious and the political. The rise of Islam is exposing the bankruptcy of Western culture’s gods of pluralism and multiculturalism. The solution is not for the church to defend those gods. Rather, we have much to learn from global Christianity’s embrace of the communal and public character of Christian faith.

Republic of Grace

In the latest Mars Hill Audio Journal, Ken Myers has a fascinating interview with Charles Mathewes about his book The Republic of Grace: Augustinian Thoughts for Dark Times. Sounds like a helpful read for anyone engaged in issues of Christ and culture, church and state, and the like. To whet your appetite: according to Mathewes, Madison – precisely as a good Presbyterian – wanted the American republic to be “eschatologically disappointing.”

Turning the Church Inside Out

New audio from Nelson Kloosterman: Turning the Church Inside Out (scroll down to the bottom of the page). Looks like great stuff!

  • Session 1: The Bible’s Story: Election for Serving
  • Session 2: Christ’s Demonstration: Obedience in Suffering
  • Session 3: The Church’s Calling: Exhibiting the Gospel Culture
  • A Sense of Owingness

    A Sense of Owingness, R. J. Snell:

    “One mark of our cultural abnormality is how strange it seems to think of freedom as marked by self-restraint, loyalty, fidelity, reverence, piety, or responsibility. We tend to think that freedom is the absence of responsibility.”