The Age-old Promised Thing

“The story [of the Gospel of Luke] is thus one of movement and fulfillment; movement and mission; God and his promises to Abraham; God and Abraham’s seed; God and his covenant with David; God and recalcitrant Israel; God and renewed Israel; God and the nations he said he would bless: for God himself is on the move (keeping promises, answering prayer, filling a people, working  miracles, stretching out his hand, setting prisoners free, spreading his people abroad, and overseeing their participation in his redemptive mission). God is doing something new in the world – first through his Spirit-empowered servant Jesus (3:22; 4:1, 14, 18-19) and then (and now) through the Spirit-filled followers of Jesus (11:11-13; 24:48-49; Acts 1:4-8; 2:1-21). But this new thing is the age-old promised thing, the thing for which faithful Israel had for so long been waiting. The story of national Israel has reached its divinely intended climax – it is time for Yahweh’s renewed temple-people to be a house of prayer made up of all nations.” (Craig G. Bartholomew and Robby Holt, ”Prayer in/and the Drama of Redemption in Luke” in Reading Luke: Interpretation, Reflection, Formation, Bartholomew, et. al. eds., p. 360)

Adoption in the Heidelberg Catechism

Though it’s not as explicit as we might like, the doctrine of adoption is found in several places in the Heidelberg Catechism. One of those beautiful passages is in Lord’s Day 9, Q&A 26, on our confession of God the Father.

Q. 26 What do you believe when you say, “I believe in God, the Father, Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth”? A. That the eternal Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who out of nothing created heaven and earth and everything in them, who still upholds and rules them by his eternal counsel and providence, is my God and Father because of Christ his Son. I trust him so much that I do not doubt he will provide whatever I need for body and soul, and he will turn to my good whatever adversity he sends me in this sad world. He is able to do this because he is almighty God; he desires to do this because he is a faithful Father.

God is first of all the eternal Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. As the Catechism makes clear elsewhere, we are united to Christ by faith, and therefore all of his benefits become ours. One of those benefits is sonship. Because Jesus is God’s Son, and because we are united to him by faith, God is “my God and Father because of Christ his Son.” We are adopted sons and daughters of the Father in Christ.

Think of the Bridge!

As part of an exhortation to preach Christ in a non-introspective way, T. David Gordon offers the following wonderful quote in his Why Johnny Can’t Preach (pp. 76-77). The Southern Presbyterian theologian Robert Lewis Dabney knew that his death was drawing near and wrote to his old friend Vaughan, expressing his doubts about the strength of his faith in the face of death. Vaughan responded to Dabney with the illustration of a traveler who was to cross a bridge over a chasm:

“What does he do to breed confidence in the bridge? He looks at the bridge; he gets down and examines it. He don’t [sic] stand at the bridge-head and turn his thoughts curiously in on his own mind to see if he has confidence in the bridge. If his examination of the bridge gives him a certain amount of confidence, and yet he wants more, how does he make his faith grow? Why, in the same way; he still continues to examine the bridge. Now, my dear old man, let your faith take care of itself for awhile, and you just think of what you are allowed to trust in. Think of the Master’s power, think of his love; think how he is interested in the soul that searches for him, and will not be comforted until he finds him. Think of what he has done, his work. That blood of his is mightier than all the sins of all the sinners that ever lived. Don’t you think it will master yours?…

“Now, dear old friend, I have done to you just what I would want you to do to me if I were lying in your place. The great theologian, after all, is just like any other one of God’s children, and the simple gospel talked to him is just as essential to his comfort as it is to a milk-maid or to a plow-boy. May God give you grace, not to lay too much stress on your faith, but to grasp the great ground of confidence, Christ, and all his work and all his personal fitness to be a sinner’s refuge. Faith is only an eye to see him. I have been praying that God would quiet your pains as you advance, and enable you to see the gladness of the gospel at every step. Good-bye. God be with you as he will. Think of the bridge! Your brother, C. R. V.”

What They Were Not Before

‘Speaking of the difference between those who “receive” literature versus those who merely “use” it, C. S. Lewis said, “The first reading of some literary work is often, to the literary, so momentous that only experiences of love, religion, or bereavement can furnish a standard of comparison. Their whole consciousness is changed. They have become what they were not before. But there is no sign of anything like this among the other sort of readers. When they have finished the story or the novel, nothing much, or nothing at all, seems to have happened to them.”‘ Experiment in Criticism, p. 3, cited in T. David Gordon, Why Johnny Can’t Preach, p. 50.

Strongest Impressions of 2011

Jeffrey Overstreet has been our guide for film viewing for the last several years. We’ve always found his reviews to be insightful, and he’s certainly led us into a deeper appreciation for the poetic and artistic character of good film. A great place to start is with his yearly top ten lists. Here are his lists for 1980-2010. He recently released his lists for 2011, in two parts:

Strongest Impressions of 2011, Part 1

Strongest Impressions of 2011, Part 2

I should also mention that Overstreet is a talented novelist. His books are all worth reading.

While not as canonical for us as his film reviews, his list of top albums for 2011 was just published as well.

A Stretched People

“We are a stretched people, citizens of a kingdom that is both older and newer than anything offered by ‘the contemporary.’ The practices of Christian worship over the liturgical year form in us something of an ‘old soul’ that is perpetually pointed to a future, longing for a coming kingdom, and seeking to be such a stretched people in the present who are a foretaste of the coming kingdom” (James K. A. Smith, Desiring the Kingdom, 159).

A Sign to the Coming Kingdom

“‘God’s reign arrives wherever Jesus overcomes the power of evil.’ Thus Jesus erects signs of healing and salvation that point to the presence of the kingdom. Again we see the missionary thrust of Jesus’ ministry. His ministry inspires us to prolong the logic of his mission. Since God’s reign has already come, it will come. God’s reign is both gift and promise, celebration and anticipation. The church’s mission is to live in the tension of the already-but-not-yet so that ‘something of the “not yet” may take shape in the here and now.’ Thus the church, like Jesus, erects signs of God’s reign; it commits itself to attack evil in its manifestations and ‘to initiate, here and now, approximations and anticipations of God’s reign,’ especially in the life of the church. The church’s communal life itself will be a sign to the coming kingdom, a people in whom something of the ‘not yet’ is in evidence. As sign the church will embody new relationships that point to the love and justice of the kingdom. As such it will be a ‘radically revolutionary movement’ providing an attractive alternative.” Michael Goheen, “A Critical Examination of David Bosch’s Missional Reading of Luke,” in Reading Luke: Interpretation, Reflection, Formation, p. 238.

The Discipline of Reading

The Taste of Honey

“But book-reading is never less than a discipline, and discipline requires self-discipline, and self-discipline is never easy. If we are honest both about the delights of reading and the discomforts of reading, I think we can better help our friends discover that books offer life-altering use and life-giving delight, knowledge and pleasure, truth and joy, light and heat.”

Reading as Discipline

“This does not mean that our appetites are not in need of some, or even great, disciplining, but the goal of all discipline is not restraint but freedom. The trained appetite is free to gain the most pleasure—and use—from the best books.”

The Righteousness of God in Daniel 9

Sinclair Ferguson, commenting on Daniel 9 in his commentary on Daniel, pp. 177-178:

‘Daniel’s praying was of the same order [as that of Elijah, cited by James] as his appeal to the “righteousness” of God eloquently testifies (vv. 7, 16). The Old Testament term “righteousness” has a specifically covenantal orientation. The young Martin Luther could not see this when he struggled to understand what Paul meant by “the righteousness of God” (Rom. 1:17). Of course, Luther was not helped by the fact that his Latin Bible translated Paul’s Greek word dikaiosune (righteousness) as justitia (justice). Luther’s mistake has sometimes been repeated by evangelical Christians. Often righteousness has been thought of merely as the equivalent of the just punishment of God. Preachers therefore may often accompany the use of the phrase “the righteousness of God” with the gesticulation of a clenched fist. It is clear even from this passage, however, that this is to reduce the full biblical meaning of God’s righteousness. Daniel sees the righteousness of God both as the basis for God’s judgment of the people (v. 7) and also as the basis for his own prayer for forgiveness (v. 16). How can this be? In Scripture, “righteousness” basically means “integrity.” Sometimes it is defined as “conformity to a norm.” In the case of God, the norm to which he conforms is his own being and character. He is true to himself; he always acts in character.

‘God has expressed the norm of his relationship to his people by means of a covenant. He will always be true and faithful to his covenant and the promises enshrined in it. Plainly, God’s righteousness is his faithfulness to his covenant relationship.

‘Daniel underlines God’s faithfulness to his covenantal promise to punish the covenant-breaking of his people: “O Lord, righteousness belongs to you, but to us shame of face… Yes, all Israel has transgressed your law, and has departed [from the covenant] so as not to obey your voice; therefore the curse and the oath written in the Law of Moses… has been poured out on us because we have sinned against him… Therefore the Lord has kept the disaster in mind, and brought it upon us; for the Lord our God is righteous in all the works which he does, though we have not obeyed his voice” (vv. 7-14). In contrast, the same righteousness of God is made the ground for Daniel’s appeal for mercy because he knows that God has promised to receive his penitent people and to restore them to fellowship with himself. His covenant righteousness holds out the hope of forgiveness, and Daniel clings to this with his whole heart: “O Lord, according to all your righteousness… let your anger and your fury be turned away… because of our sins… your people are a reproach to all those around us” (v. 16).’

The White Pine

The White Pine has a new website. They also had a nice mention in this article about the Brass Razoo.